Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

TPU shoe material rebound testing quantifies the energy return of thermoplastic polyurethane used in midsoles, outsoles, and cushioning systems, providing objective data for material selection and quality control. This technical guide explains the relevant test standards, specimen preparation, instrumentation, and data interpretation used in professional footwear laboratories. Understanding rebound resilience helps developers balance cushioning, durability, and performance in modern athletic and casual footwear.

TPU

Technical Overview

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is a versatile elastomer widely adopted in the footwear industry for midsoles, outsoles, shanks, air cushion units, and decorative films. One of the most important performance attributes of TPU in these applications is rebound resilience, defined as the ratio of returned elastic energy to applied impact energy, expressed as a percentage. A higher rebound value indicates that more of the energy absorbed during foot strike is returned to the wearer, which translates into a livelier, more responsive ride and reduced energy loss over long distances.

Rebound performance of TPU is strongly influenced by its chemical formulation, hardness, foaming ratio, and service temperature. Solid TPU compounds in the Shore 85A to 60D range typically exhibit rebound values of 30% to 50%, while expanded TPU (E-TPU) bead foams, such as those used in premium running midsoles, can achieve 55% to 70% or higher. Because these values directly affect product positioning and marketing claims, laboratory rebound testing has become a standard step in both material development and incoming quality inspection for footwear brands and compound suppliers.

Testing Samples

Solid TPU Specimens

Solid TPU test plaques are produced by compression molding or injection molding into flat sheets with a minimum thickness of 6 mm, or by stacking thinner sheets to reach the required thickness. The test surface must be smooth, free of bubbles, sink marks, and flash, as surface defects can scatter rebound data. Specimens are typically die-cut to dimensions of approximately 50 mm × 50 mm to ensure the impact zone is fully supported.

Expanded TPU (E-TPU) Foam Specimens

E-TPU bead foams are steam-chest molded into plaques with a target density between 150 kg/m³ and 350 kg/m³. The molded density, fusion quality, and foaming pressure all affect resilience, so specimens must record molding parameters. A minimum thickness of 10 mm is recommended for foam testing to prevent the impactor from bottoming out against the test platform.

Finished Shoe Components

Midsole and outsole sections cut from finished shoes can also be tested when the specimen thickness is sufficient. Curved components are sectioned into flat test pieces, and any fabric, adhesive layer, or encapsulated stabilizer must be removed or documented, because attached layers artificially alter the measured rebound value.

All specimens shall be conditioned at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 5% relative humidity for at least 24 hours prior to testing, unless a specific low-temperature or heat-aged condition is being evaluated.

Testing Items

A complete TPU shoe material rebound evaluation program typically includes the following items:

  • Vertical ball rebound resilience (ASTM D3574 Test H for foamed materials, ASTM D2632 for solid elastomers)
  • Pendulum (Schob) rebound resilience (ISO 4662, DIN 53512)
  • Low-temperature rebound resilience at −10 °C, −20 °C, or −40 °C after dwell conditioning
  • Rebound retention after heat aging, hydrolysis aging, or repeated compression fatigue
  • Supporting characterization: Shore A/D hardness (ISO 868, ASTM D2240), density (ISO 845, ISO 1183), and compression set, which are reported alongside rebound values for full material comparison

Testing Methods

Ball Rebound Method

In the vertical ball rebound test, a polished steel ball of 16 mm diameter is dropped from a fixed height of 500 mm onto the horizontally clamped specimen. The maximum rebound height is captured optically or by a sensor array, and rebound resilience is calculated as:

R = (h₂ / h₁) × 100%, where h₁ is the drop height and h₂ is the rebound height. The reported value is the mean of at least five impacts on different points of the specimen, and the test value must fall within the calibrated measuring range of the instrument to be valid.

Pendulum Rebound Method

The Schob pendulum test uses a hammer of defined mass and geometry mounted on a nearly frictionless bearing. The pendulum is released from a defined angle α, strikes the specimen at a controlled velocity, and rebounds to angle β. Rebound resilience is calculated as:

R = (1 − cos β) / (1 − cos α) × 100%. The pendulum method applies a higher strain energy input than the ball method and is frequently specified for solid TPU compounds in supplier datasheets across Europe and Asia.

Low-Temperature and Aged Conditioning Protocols

For winter footwear and high-latitude markets, specimens are conditioned in a chamber at the target temperature for 4 to 24 hours and tested within seconds of removal, since rebound recovery begins immediately upon warming. Comparative testing of unaged versus aged specimens reveals how hydrolysis, UV exposure, and fatigue affect the elastic network of TPU over its service life.

Applications

Rebound test data from TPU shoe materials support decisions across the entire footwear value chain:

  • Midsole development: screening polyester, polyether, and aliphatic TPU grades, and optimizing the foam density and cell structure of E-TPU bead foams for running and court shoes
  • Material benchmarking: comparing TPU against EVA, PEBA, TPEE, and rubber compounds to substantiate performance claims and cost-performance trade-offs
  • Incoming quality control: verifying that batches of TPU granules or molded components meet the rebound specification agreed between brands and suppliers
  • Durability studies: tracking rebound retention after flex fatigue, aging, and washing to predict long-term cushioning performance
  • Certification and marketing support: generating laboratory evidence for energy-return claims used in product documentation

FAQ

What rebound value is considered good for TPU shoe materials?

For solid TPU, values of 35% to 50% are typical and competitive with high-quality rubber compounds. For E-TPU bead foams used in performance midsoles, values of 60% or above are generally regarded as excellent, and leading commercial products reach approximately 70%.

Does a higher rebound value always mean better cushioning?

No. Rebound measures energy return, while cushioning depends on the full force-deformation curve, hardness, and compression set. A midsole with high rebound but excessive hardness may feel harsh; optimal comfort requires balancing rebound with compression modulus and durability data.

Why do ball and pendulum methods give different numbers for the same TPU?

The two methods apply different impact energies, strain rates, and contact geometries. Results are correlated but not interchangeable, so comparisons must always be made within the same method and standard.

How does temperature affect TPU rebound results?

Rebound generally decreases as temperature drops because molecular segment mobility is reduced, with polyether-based TPU grades usually retaining flexibility better than polyester grades at low temperature. Testing at both room temperature and the target service temperature is recommended for cold-climate footwear.

How thick must a rebound specimen be?

Solid TPU specimens typically require a minimum of 6 mm, while foamed E-TPU specimens require at least 10 mm. If the finished component is thinner, multiple layers may be bonded and tested, provided the layering is disclosed in the report.

How many test points are required for a reliable result?

A minimum of five valid impacts at spaced locations is standard practice, and outliers caused by surface voids or bead boundaries are excluded according to the applicable standard. Laboratory reports should state the mean value, standard deviation, test standard, temperature, and specimen conditioning history.